Story | 02/25/2021 14:52:33 | 4 min Read time

Corporations are necessary for meeting climate goals

With climate change posing a grave threat to business continuity, big business may have no choice but to embrace decarbonisation.

Any serious endeavour must have a clear matrix to judge success and failures. This is even more critical when the endeavour is to literally save the living planet. I am talking about the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its successes and failures in tackling the climate crisis. A dispassionate and objective assessment of the UNFCCC’s performance is critical to finding a pathway for ambitious climate action and hence our chances of meeting the 1.5°C target.

Our aspiration is high when we respond to the global climate challenge

Let’s be clear: UNFCCC has failed in its objective to “stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” Over the past 26 years, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), has increased from 358 parts per million (ppm) in 1994 to 412 ppm in August 2020. A concentration of 400 ppm CO2 was last witnessed on earth about 3 million years ago. The global temperature has steadily increased; in 2019, the average global temperature was 0.95°C above the 20th-century average of 13.9°C, making it the second-warmest year on record.

A quarter of Fortune Global 500 companies have made a public commitment to become carbon neutral by 2030 or meet a science-based emission reduction target.

Despite the impressive growth in renewable energy in the last few years, the global energy system has remained unchanged. In 1994, about 80% of the global primary energy supply came from fossil fuels; this figure has remained unchanged in 2019. The number of the energy poor has also remained constant: about 2.8 billion people still use polluting solid fuels to cook food. This has happened largely because countries have failed to take leadership on climate issues, and UNFCCC doesn’t have the tools to drive fast global collective action to combat the climate crisis.

The IPCC’s special report makes it clear that to limit warming at 1.5°C, CO2 emissions will have to be reduced by 45% by 2030 from 2010 levels and reach net-zero by 2050. This means that we just have a decade to turn around the energy system and cut emissions drastically. Can the UNFCCC alone deliver on this? Can we solely rely on governments to deliver 1.5°C? The answer, unfortunately, is no to both questions. It is now clear that without sincere commitments from corporations, we will not be able to meet our climate goals.

The world’s top corporations have more economic prowess than governments. They also are responsible for the lion’s share of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Corporations, therefore, are part of the problem, but they are also the solution. Consider these facts:

  • Just 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of the global GHG emissions since 1988, the year IPCC was established.
  • More than two-thirds of the richest 100 entities on the planet are corporations, not governments. In fact, the revenue of the top 10 corporations is higher than the revenue of the bottom 196 governments combined.

Corporations, therefore, have the resources to transform their businesses into zero carbon by investing in renewable and other zero-carbon technologies and by developing products and services with small carbon footprints. The question is: will they do it voluntarily, or should there be mandatory regulations for it?

There are indications that larger corporations are moving towards decarbonisation because they consider climate change as a grave threat to their business continuity and survivability. For example, a quarter of Fortune Global 500 companies have made a public commitment to become carbon neutral by 2030 or meet a science-based emission reduction target.

UPM’s low-carbon fuels and climate-smart energy production solutions

It is also a fact that business needs clear rules and regulations for a level playing field. We do not want a world where some corporations freeride, while others become uncompetitive. So, regulations will have an important role to play to push the laggards to climate action. But here also we should recognise the limitations; regulations are generally the least common denominator.

Chandra Bhushan is the CEO of the International Forum for Environment,
Sustainability & Technology (iFOREST).

I, therefore, believe that both voluntary action and regulations will not be sufficient; we will have to change the charter of corporations to make climate change a fiduciary duty of the board of directors and hold them accountable for polluting the climate. This is the only way to make companies commit sincerely to climate goals.

Chandra Bhushan home page

By Chandra Bhushan
Photography iFOREST

Plywood packaging with recycled plastic cuts waste, carbon and costs
Story | 5 min

Plywood packaging with recycled plastic cuts waste, carbon and costs

Read more
Looking beyond the label
Story | 2 min

Looking beyond the label

Read more
New modern technology LNG vessels have exceeded expectations
Story | 4 min

New modern technology LNG vessels have exceeded expectations

Read more